tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7279728853940217773.post2607144077946452752..comments2023-07-05T08:50:25.358-07:00Comments on EGR 393: Lab 10Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10993354208204279188noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7279728853940217773.post-82791238204261943172017-04-11T18:41:55.424-07:002017-04-11T18:41:55.424-07:00no comments. Where are your graphs for part A?no comments. Where are your graphs for part A?Tolga Kayahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07285135470525095408noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7279728853940217773.post-54350133045205564712017-03-27T02:33:01.273-07:002017-03-27T02:33:01.273-07:00You seem to be missing some graphs in your blog so...You seem to be missing some graphs in your blog so I would look into that. I suggest bolding the questions so it is easier to differentiate your answers from the questions. Everything we have for part A seems very similar to what you have. We used a higher input voltage peak to peak so our data is different. I am not sure where this confusion came from. Because of this, our graphs are not linear like everyone else’s. <br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04333796826662450051noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7279728853940217773.post-13259390618743382672017-03-27T01:51:38.811-07:002017-03-27T01:51:38.811-07:00For formatting wise, try highlighting or changing ...For formatting wise, try highlighting or changing the color of the codes font for visibility purposes, I see you're missing some graphs from #1, 8, and 10. Other than that the graphs for the low/high filters and their cutoff values seem to be correct later in the blog.gggghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04487372781227426394noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7279728853940217773.post-82280422875888586942017-03-26T20:03:32.928-07:002017-03-26T20:03:32.928-07:00i think you blog looks good but i am wondering how...i think you blog looks good but i am wondering how did you find the cut off frequency in the last question because i find it using different way Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12782340419552059251noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7279728853940217773.post-69288836045749351362017-03-26T18:03:19.104-07:002017-03-26T18:03:19.104-07:00I noticed that you guys along with a number of oth...I noticed that you guys along with a number of other groups converted your pk to pk input and output values to rms values. I am beginning to realize this may be where my group made a mistake I thought that as long as we compared pk to pk values that our cutoff value should still be at .707*Vin. I am having trouble telling if you guys had the same cutoff frequency for your low pass filter as your high pass like we theoretically should have.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15811825773638621944noreply@blogger.com