Friday, February 3, 2017

Lab 4

1. (Table and graph) Use the transistor by itself. The goal is to create the graph for IC (y axis) versus VBE (x axis). Connect base and collector. DO NOT EXCEED 1 V for VBE. Make sure you have the required voltage value set before applying it to the base. Transistor might get really hot. Do not TOUCH THE TRANSISTOR! Make sure to get enough data points to graph. (Suggestion: measure for VBE = 0V, 0.5V, and 1V and fill the gaps if necessary by taking extra measurements).

VBE (V)
Current (mA)
0.070
9.8
0.175
22.7
0.336
44.1
0.500
66.7
0.732
83.0
Table 1: This table shows the growth of IC compared to the growth of VBE

Graph 1: This VBE and IC graph illustrates the exponential increase in the transistor

2. (Table and graph) Create the graph for IC (y axis) versus VCE (x axis). Vary VCE from 0 V to 5 V. Do this measurement for 3 different VBE values: 0V, 0.7V, and 0.8V.
Graph 2: This shows the distribution of the the VCE, VBE and IC tables

VCE (V)
VBE (V)
IC(mA)
0.714
0.823
74.4
1.024
0.823
130
1.485
0.823
155
2.016
0.823
241
Table 2: This table  shows how IC varies with the fluctuation of VCE while VBE stays the same at .8V

VCE (V)
VBE (V)
Ic (mA)
.7
.716
12.25
.972
.716
13.25
1.44
.716
14.05
2.114
.716
15.48
2.941
.716
18.7
3.971
.716
24.4
Table 3; This table shows how IC changes with VCE changing and VBE staying stable at .7V

VCE (V)
VBE (V)
IC(mA)
0-5 *
0
0
*With any value of VCE, IC= 0
Table 4: This table shows when VBE is zero, Ic also stays zero no matter the voltage from VCE


3. (Table) Apply the following bias voltages and fill out the table. How is IC and IB related? Does your data support your theory?

VBE (V)
VCE (V)
Ic (mA)
Ib (mA)
.7
2
12.9
2.7
.75
2
53.3
7.2
.817
2
82.8
16.4
Table 5: This table shows the relation between IC and IB while VBE changes and VCE remains stable

IC is fairly consistently a multiple of IB, which is consistent with our theories based on the purpose of the transistor: to amplify current. Therefore, it makes sense for the current at the collector to be higher than that at the base.


4. (Table) Explain photocell outputs with different light settings. Create a table for the light conditions and photocell resistance.

Lighting
Resistance (kΩ)
No Light
7.1
Partial Light
5.15
Room Light
1.73
Flash Light
.745
Table 6: This table shows how diffent shades of light affect the photocell


The photo resistor is a resistor of varying values depending on the amount of light on it. The higher input of light, the lower the resistance value. Moving forward this will mean that light on this photocell will allow the motor to run, while less light would slow it down or stop it all together.


5. (Table) Apply voltage (0 to 5 V with 1 V steps) to DC motor directly and measure the current using the DMM.

Voltage (V)
Current (mA)
.082
6.22
.92
30.2
1.969
39.3
2.962
43.5
3.95
49.6
5.05
54.9
Table 7: This table shows the increase in current as the voltage increases

6. Apply 2 V to the DC motor and measure the current. Repeat this by increasing the load on the DC motor. Slightly pinching the shaft would do the trick.

The more load on the motor the higher the current would spike to keep the motor rotating. However since the motor is quite small the motor ends up stopping at about 125 mA.

7. (Video) Create the circuit below (same circuit from week 1). Explain the operation in detail.
Video 1: This video explains the process happening during the Rube Goldberg circuit set up

8. Explain R4’s role by changing its value to a smaller and bigger resistors and observing the voltage and the current at the collector of the transistor.

Resistance (Ω)
Voltage (V)
Current (mA)
0
10.2
31.2
47
10.2
31.0
390
10.2
25.6
1.2k
10.2
8.64
Table 8: This table demonstrates how the change in resistance for R4 will affect the current


R4 reduces the current going through the collector of the transistor. A higher resistance will lower the current through the transistor and the motor in accordance with ohm’s law. 

9. (Video) Create your own Rube Goldberg setup.

Video 2: Our Rube Goldberg created in class

7 comments:

  1. in question #4 we got the same value for the resistor in the room light which is 1.73 k ohm but we got smaller value than you with the flash light.
    also, i have noticed that in question #7 you didn't talk about what will happen the motor if we use the flash light.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I find it interesting that in question #1 our graph had a much steeper slope than yours, I'm not really sure why this could have occurred other than a difference in the transistor. Also, for question #4 our photoresistor had a much higher resistance value of 25Kohms, we must have had a different one. Good Job this week!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Overall it looks really good! Your table set ups are really good looking also. Did you have any complications with your Rube Goldberg set up? Ours was difficult at some points. Figuring out the correct voltages and currents made it tough. We may even have blown a few diodes trying to get things to work correctly.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Im a little bit confused about how you drew your first two graphs by hand. Did you simply plot the points and connect the dots by hand? I believe it is important to draw a line of best fit and therefore I believe it is important to use some sort of software in order to show a more accurate curve.

    ReplyDelete
  5. For #1, your data doesn't seem to match ours, what is problematic is that your graph does not seem to show a transistors relationship as exponential. Some of your tables information looks extremely confusing, however, I didn't have any problems with your graphs. Its cool to see you created a Rube Goldberg using a motor as an electric pulley, unfortunately we didn't get ours done because of complications, but its still cool to see yours is working.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I noticed that you did not use zero for your voltage in number one. Is that because you thought it was irrelevant of because your power supply does not reach zero? We have had trouble getting ours to zero. I would suggest using excel for your graphs. It may take a second to learn, but I honestly think it will be faster than hand graphing. It also looks nicer and is easier to read. Our photoresistors may have been rated differently, but we got ours to reach 14k instead of 7k. We were also able to get ours much lower than yours with the flashlight, all the way down to 62 Ohms. Our values for number 5 are similar for the most part. I like your idea for your Rube Goldberg machine. It would be very easy to incorporate into a circuit.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Please respond to your comments.
    Good RG.

    ReplyDelete